Government jobs • Exam updates • PreparationIndependent information portal
RojgarRankYOUR NEXT STEP STARTS HERE
Current Affairs

CIC Rules BCCI Is Not a Public Authority Under RTI Act 2005

By Published

On 18 May 2026, the Central Information Commission (CIC) declared that the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is not a 'public authority' under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005. The commission clarified that BCCI is a private autonomous body registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, not owned, controlled, or substantially financed by the government, and thus not subject to RTI disclosures. This ruling reversed a 2018 CIC order which had brought BCCI under RTI, following challenges and remands by the Madras High Court. The government also decided not to amend the National Sports Governance Bill to cover BCCI under RTI, limiting it to government-funded sports bodies.

On this page

Key Facts

  • The CIC ruled on 18 May 2026 that the BCCI is not a "public authority" under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act, 2005.
  • BCCI is registered as a private society under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act.
  • The BCCI is not owned, controlled, nor substantially financed by the government.
  • This order reversed a 2018 CIC ruling which had classified BCCI as a public authority.
  • The Madras High Court remitted the matter back to the CIC in September 2025 for fresh adjudication.
  • The government dropped plans to include BCCI in the RTI ambit by amending the National Sports Governance Bill, restricting it to government-funded sports bodies.

Background & Context

The RTI Act, 2005 mandates transparency from public authorities defined under Section 2(h). These include bodies established by the Constitution, laws by Parliament or State Legislatures, or government notifications, or those substantially financed or controlled by the government.

The BCCI functions as the national cricket governing body but operates as a private autonomous society. In 2018, CIC had earlier held BCCI as a public authority, making it subject to RTI information requests. BCCI challenged this, and the Madras High Court remitted the issue for a fresh CIC hearing.

On reconsideration in 2026, the CIC concluded BCCI does not meet the public authority criteria, emphasizing that tax exemptions or concessions do not amount to substantial government financing.

The government clarified that sports bodies covered under RTI through legislative amendments would only include those substantially funded by the government, leaving bodies like BCCI outside this purview.

Why This Matters for Exams

This CIC ruling clarifies the definition and scope of 'public authority' under the RTI Act, a frequent topic in governance and constitutional law sections of competitive exams.

Understanding this judgment is critical to know the nuances of transparency laws, the interplay between private bodies performing public functions and the RTI Act, and recent judicial pronouncements.

Dates, legal provisions (Section 2(h) of RTI Act), institutions involved (CIC, BCCI), and related legislative bills (National Sports Governance Bill, 2025) are important for objective questions.

Points to Remember

  • RTI Act defines a public authority under Section 2(h) by establishment method or government ownership/control/financing.
  • BCCI is registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act as a private body.
  • CIC ruling date: 18 May 2026; previous contrasting order in October 2018.
  • Madras High Court remitted the case back to CIC in September 2025.
  • Government excluded BCCI from RTI ambit in National Sports Governance Bill, 2025, limiting to government-funded bodies only.
  • Tax exemptions to BCCI do not qualify as substantial government financing under RTI Act.
← Back to Current Affairs